Posts Tagged ‘Bill Belichick’

Patriot Caper Yields Fine, Draft Pick Forfeiture

September 13th, 2007 - 6:24pm by AndrewOther posts by Andrew

Give NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell credit for one thing … his justice is swift.

Below is the text of the release issued regarding his penalties for the Patriots — a $500,000 fine to Bill Belichick, a $250,000 fine to the team and the loss of either a first-round pick or second- and third-picks, depending on whether they make the playoffs. If they qualify for the postseason, it’s a first-rounder; if not, it’s the No. 2 and No. 3.

New England Patriots Head Coach Bill Belichick has been fined the maximum amount under the NFL Constitution and By-Laws of $500,000 for violating league policy last Sunday on the use of equipment to videotape an opposing team’s offensive or defensive signals, the NFL announced today.

In addition, Commissioner Roger Goodell also notified the Patriots that they would forfeit their own first-round draft choice in 2008 if they reach the playoffs, or their own second-round and third-round picks if they do not qualify for the playoffs, and that the club would be fined $250,000.

“This episode represents a calculated and deliberate attempt to avoid longstanding rules designed to encourage fair play and promote honest competition on the playing field,” Commissioner Goodell wrote in a letter to the Patriots.

NFL policy states that “no video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches’ booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game” and that all video shooting locations for club coaching purposes “must be enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead.”

In a memo to NFL head coaches and general managers on September 6, 2006, NFL Executive Vice President of Football Operations Ray Anderson said, “Videotaping of any type, including but not limited to taping of an opponent’s offensive or defensive signals, is prohibited on the sidelines, in the coaches’ booth, in the locker room, or at any other locations accessible to club staff members during the game.”

In his review of the facts, Commissioner Goodell determined that the Patriots’ use last Sunday of the video camera, which was seized before the end of the first quarter, had no impact on the outcome of the Patriots-New York Jets game.

Commissioner Goodell also believes that Patriots ownership was unaware of Coach Belichick’s action, but determined that penalties should be imposed on the club because “Coach Belichick not only serves as the head coach but also has substantial control over all aspects of New England’s football operations. His actions and decisions are properly attributed to the club.”

Commissioner Goodell informed the Patriots that the NFL would closely review and monitor the Patriots’ coaching video program, effective immediately.

“I specifically considered whether to impose a suspension on Coach Belichick,” Commissioner Goodell wrote. “I have determined not to do so, largely because I believe that the discipline I am imposing of a maximum fine and forfeiture of a first-round draft choice, or multiple draft choices, is in fact more significant and long-lasting, and therefore more effective, than a suspension.”

I heard fans on one radio show suggesting a suspension. I also read an article in the Florida Times-Union in which Jaguars defensive lineman Paul Spicer suggested banning the Patriots from the postseason if they were guilty.

What do you think? Is the punishment enough? Weigh in below.

Pats Issue: Worthy of Novelization

September 13th, 2007 - 2:21am by AndrewOther posts by Andrew

As Patriots head coach Bill Belichick confirmed that he had talked with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell about the allegations regarding his team and the video capture of hand signals going from the bench to players on the field, the issue continued to be as engrossing as a spy thriller.

All that’s missing is the romantic subplot.

“Someone said, ‘If you’re not cheating, you’re not trying.’ Someone was just joking in the dining hall that maybe that’s how they won all those Super Bowls,” Denver safety Nick Ferguson said. “I don’t know. I’m just here to see what you guys report.”

And those of us in the laptop-and-notepad set went right for the one Broncos player who might understand the situation best — tight end Daniel Graham, a veteran of five campaigns with the New Englanders.

“He would be the person to ask about that,” Ferguson said.

So the horde collectively swarmed around Graham. The affable Coloradoan — or is it Coloradan? — however, kept his mouth shut. Unlike the brothers Gibb, Graham wouldn’t go back to Massachusetts.

“I’m not sure about what was going on when I was up there, but I’m here in Denver now, so it’s nothing I have to worry about,” Graham said. “It’s something I’m not even worried about. I don’t have to deal with that. If they were doing that, they have to deal with it.”

Broncos sssistant head coach/defense Jim Bates said that he takes steps to avoid any interception of signals.

“Well, it’s notorious that it goes on in the league, either people stealing from the sidelines or they’ve got a coach assigned as far as trying to steal signals,” he said. “We’re awfully guarded. We’re really guarded, as far as people stealing signals.”

That means occasionally using dummy signals to deceive any potential poachers.

“Oh yes, it’s part of it,” he said. “You use two or three different guys as far as giving signals, and we try to disguise as much as possible so people can’t get our signals.”

Of course, there’s an easy solution to all this — to have one defensive player wear a radio receiver, thus balancing the edge the offense has by having its quarterback equipped (which is symbolized by the green dot on the back of the helmet).

“I think it would neutralize the game for us, as far as us giving some heads up,” he said. “Because they can talk to the quarterback, the offensive coordinator or whoever is talking to the quarterback, they can give him some added advice that we cannot give our defense.

“So it’s definitely an advantage for the offense and we should have that. We should have the headsets or the communication skills that they have on offense.”

That would be the easy solution. But few spy novels have such an obvious resolution.