Comments on: A Final Look Back http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/ Wed, 22 May 2013 21:24:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: baylinorcrush http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/comment-page-1/#comment-95301 baylinorcrush Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:21:40 +0000 http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=6514#comment-95301 Seems as we all agree, it's a total joke. Seems as we all agree, it’s a total joke.

]]> By: codybleedsorangeandblue http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/comment-page-1/#comment-95298 codybleedsorangeandblue Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:02:05 +0000 http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=6514#comment-95298 Ban the 3 point stance? What is next banning sacks? banning fumble recovery dog piles? That is just unamerican! Ban the 3 point stance? What is next banning sacks? banning fumble recovery dog piles? That is just unamerican!

]]> By: DOOmervilfan http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/comment-page-1/#comment-95297 DOOmervilfan Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:45:57 +0000 http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=6514#comment-95297 Ban the three-point stance? Are you kidding me! Why dont they just ban all contact and play flag football? That is ridiculous! Ban the three-point stance? Are you kidding me! Why dont they just ban all contact and play flag football? That is ridiculous!

]]> By: brian_schneider http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/comment-page-1/#comment-95284 brian_schneider Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:49:34 +0000 http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=6514#comment-95284 That is also ridiculous. That is also ridiculous.

]]> By: broncofanlvnm http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/comment-page-1/#comment-95277 broncofanlvnm Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:15:06 +0000 http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=6514#comment-95277 I wasn't sure you meant the part about taking away the 3-point stance (which is ridiculous) or the part where the players received 2.6 billion out of 3.6 billion of the incremental revenues since 2006. I wasn’t sure you meant the part about taking away the 3-point stance (which is ridiculous) or the part where the players received 2.6 billion out of 3.6 billion of the incremental revenues since 2006.

]]> By: brian_schneider http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/comment-page-1/#comment-95276 brian_schneider Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:14:17 +0000 http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=6514#comment-95276 If they are seriously considering this, why don't they just implement the Pro Bowl rules to all the games. This kind of crap is making me sick, I'm all for player safety and health, but c'mon man. If they are seriously considering this, why don’t they just implement the Pro Bowl rules to all the games. This kind of crap is making me sick, I’m all for player safety and health, but c’mon man.

]]> By: baylinorcrush http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/comment-page-1/#comment-95274 baylinorcrush Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:04:34 +0000 http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=6514#comment-95274 Maybe we'll introduce the ballet two toe stance instead, LOL, and twirl around while we're at it. Maybe we’ll introduce the ballet two toe stance instead, LOL, and twirl around while we’re at it.

]]> By: brian_schneider http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/comment-page-1/#comment-95272 brian_schneider Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:56:34 +0000 http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=6514#comment-95272 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100207/ap_on_sp_fo_ne/fbn_super_bowl_goodell You've got to be kidding me.... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100207/ap_on_sp_fo_ne/fbn_super_bowl_goodell

You’ve got to be kidding me….

]]> By: TheRoyalBeast http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/comment-page-1/#comment-95268 TheRoyalBeast Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:10:39 +0000 http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=6514#comment-95268 He does Cody. if a owner wants soemthign bad enough he got veto power...(Al Davis, Raiders) lol. But he said he won't if he looks at trade and its beneficial. Which means he MIGHT if the trade is not "market value" or close to it. So for those who once said, McD wants marshall gone so bad he will prolly toss him for any "OK/below average" deal....not if Bowlen has anything to say about it. He does Cody. if a owner wants soemthign bad enough he got veto power…(Al Davis, Raiders) lol. But he said he won’t if he looks at trade and its beneficial. Which means he MIGHT if the trade is not “market value” or close to it. So for those who once said, McD wants marshall gone so bad he will prolly toss him for any “OK/below average” deal….not if Bowlen has anything to say about it.

]]> By: codybleedsorangeandblue http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mrice/a-final-look-back/comment-page-1/#comment-95266 codybleedsorangeandblue Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:12:51 +0000 http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=6514#comment-95266 Baylin, Thanks for standing up for me. That is exactly what I meant. I think that Marshall and Bowlen both want Marshall to be a Bronco in the future but at the same time they both realize that football is a business and players get traded. Technically, I think Bowlen has a say in whether or not Marshall stays but he will listen to any offers that McD and Xanders bring up as far as he is concerned. Baylin,

Thanks for standing up for me. That is exactly what I meant. I think that Marshall and Bowlen both want Marshall to be a Bronco in the future but at the same time they both realize that football is a business and players get traded. Technically, I think Bowlen has a say in whether or not Marshall stays but he will listen to any offers that McD and Xanders bring up as far as he is concerned.

]]>