Comments on: Taking Notice

By: baylinorcrush

baylinorcrush — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:22:32 +0000

H-BOMB, obviously you haven’t watched Vick play this year, or you’re just here in an attempt to cause trouble. He has clearly lost some of his speed and agility, the strong part of his game and has therefore been totally inefficient for the Eagles. It would be a horrible trade.

By: H-BOMB

H-BOMB — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:40:23 +0000

tradeorton for vick

By: Broncomania56

Broncomania56 — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:59:34 +0000

HILLIS, HILLIS, HILLIS, HILLIS!!!!! Enough Said.

GO BRONCOS!!!!!!

By: Broncfalls

Broncfalls — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:05:30 +0000

Brian_Shneider!

I totally agree! Could you imagine Larsen blocking for Hillis on short yardage plays?

However, I will say this. Why isn’t it happening? I mean you and I and others on this blog would love to see that. What’s happening in practice to stop this from happening?

I know JMac talks highly of Larsen becaue of his versatility playing FB, LB and a HUGE part of the special teams. I wonder if this is more roster depth vs. anything else.

However, with Buckhalter’s knee a little banged up maybe this is the game we see him.

GO GET EM’ BOYS!

By: TheRoyalBeast

TheRoyalBeast — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:02:20 +0000

Glad to see some optimism back in the blogs….WE are still in this….a 13-3 finish is just as likely as a 6-10 finish…we dont know what the future holds but what we do know is our team was solid enough to sin 6 in a row and that doesnt come with luck. We get back to playing as a team and we can beat the chargers and take our rightful place as the leaders of the AFC West by sunday night and all the way to the playoffs

As long as simms is put into the game plan and is ready…I have faith he will do well with some assistance from our Running Game and A Defense I hope finds its pride again. Orton is pretty much a no go…I say Simms and Brandstater get all the reps incase things go REALLY south with Simms, like 3 INTs no yards in the first Half bad lol…..ANyway, I got faith, glad to know some of yall do too.

Ill go ahead and say we win 23-17…,,,and if we lose we lose 28-13…but I prefer the first one lol

GO BRONCOS!!!

By: brian_schneider

brian_schneider — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:00:49 +0000

Just to clarify my previous comment, I said “Hillis and Larsen” Hillis being the HB and Larsen being the FB. I’m sure most of you got the point but just thought I’d clarify any confusion made. It’d be like a “Jumbo” backfield.

By: denverbro89

denverbro89 — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:35:02 +0000

WOW Moreno and Hillis in the backfield…Smash and dash V.2.0

By: rayjr26

rayjr26 — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:55:23 +0000

@ brian…. ya im with you! some hard nosed smash mouth football. we need to get MEAN!! run hillis early to beat em up, then knock em out with moreno! then by the 4th quarter deep passes will be there to “stick the fork in em”. lol oh and ya, the wah.. wah.. wahhhh lmao
Go Broncos
“DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS”

By: brian_schneider

brian_schneider — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:45:44 +0000

I think that it is time to get bloody. We haven’t seen some good hard running this season..I mean some good ol’ smashmouth running. You see all the old films where there is blood all over their pants and jerseys,that’s what we need. The kind of running that makes the D get up slow and makes the CBs scared to stick their nose in there. I would love to see us come out with Hillis and Larsen. Oh man that would be something just punch right in the mouth early, but call me old fashioned, I love watching that kind of football.

By: shutout

shutout — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:44:16 +0000

I would rather here INTERCEPTED! AGAIN! FOR A 5TH TIME TODAY! RIVERS IS HAVING A CAREER WORST DAY!