I thought y’all might be interested in knowing that the roster has been updated to include the numbers that the new Broncos will wear in 2009.
2 — Chris Simms
10 — Jabar Gaffney
20 — Brian Dawkins
21 — Andre’ Goodman
23 — Renaldo Hill
28 — Correll Buckhalter
31 — J.J. Arrington
32 — LaMont Jordan
54 — Andra Davis
60 — Matt McChesney
66 — Lonie Paxton
71 — Clint Oldenburg
87 — Adam Bergen
91 — Ronald Fields
95 — Darrell Reid
Any thoughts?
– Adam Zinser, DenverBroncos.com
Tags: 2009, Adam Zinser, Free Agency

cant wait for this up coming season
ayyyyyyy go broncosss
Thanks for the info Adam.
What happend to the re-signing of Kenny Peterson? Are there problems with this contract or is The NFL review boadr backed up, do you think it was just a rumor?
TIME OF POSSESSION ! ! !
GO BRONCOS ! ! !
I wish Simms would wear another # besides 2. That is an ugly # for a quarterback. I was hoping he would wear #8 or #12 instead of #2 but I am glad to have him as a backup to Cutler and his Dad is my favorite NFL analyst.
i think simms is the best back up for us i wouldve liked to get JT more but he fell into a team that needs him more with Palmer being injury prone
Totally irrelavent to what is really happening with the Broncos: Jay Cutler is being blamed by the team for seeking a trade. How ridiculous is that when it was the Broncos who tried to trade Jay to the Bucs !! Because the team was too slow to pull the trigger on this deal, the Pats traded Cassell to KC. Instead of the Broncos giving up their first round pick to the Pats & the Bucs getting Cutler, now it looks like the new Broncos starting qb will be #2 Simms !!!!!!
i absolutly hate anyone besides nalen wearing 66 put it in the ring of fame come on and 30 is terrell davis while were on this subject not cory boyd you gotta be kidding me. only way we trade cutler is for both their first round picks and calvin johnson or just say no haha. im sick of hearing this cutler won us at least half the games last year almost by himself so a trade and we will go 4 and 12 keeping him we could do the opposite