<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Haggan to the Line?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:17:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: strandoftds</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/comment-page-2/#comment-164457</link>
		<dc:creator>strandoftds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=10611#comment-164457</guid>
		<description>new blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seweatherman1</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/comment-page-2/#comment-164453</link>
		<dc:creator>seweatherman1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=10611#comment-164453</guid>
		<description>Thanks bay!!! I was just confused over what you had here and what the news/sportscasters had aired on ESPN and our local channels about this. (We allknow what I think iof them.)

Maybe they will get this done soon then. Some of these owners may be beginning to realize that they are loosing their money-making fan base more and more as the days/weeks tick by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks bay!!! I was just confused over what you had here and what the news/sportscasters had aired on ESPN and our local channels about this. (We allknow what I think iof them.)</p>
<p>Maybe they will get this done soon then. Some of these owners may be beginning to realize that they are loosing their money-making fan base more and more as the days/weeks tick by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strandoftds</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/comment-page-2/#comment-164452</link>
		<dc:creator>strandoftds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=10611#comment-164452</guid>
		<description>I just read this myself in the DP while drinking my java, interesting. So the owners must vote when they get all of those concepts hammered out. So 24 owners must approve in order to move forward to present it to the players. Pain in the butt, but it has to be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read this myself in the DP while drinking my java, interesting. So the owners must vote when they get all of those concepts hammered out. So 24 owners must approve in order to move forward to present it to the players. Pain in the butt, but it has to be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeastFromEast92</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/comment-page-2/#comment-164451</link>
		<dc:creator>BeastFromEast92</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=10611#comment-164451</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bay for the info,even I understand that,lol.
Here&#039;s to some Football in 2011.!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bay for the info,even I understand that,lol.<br />
Here&#8217;s to some Football in 2011.!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baylinorcrush</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/comment-page-2/#comment-164449</link>
		<dc:creator>baylinorcrush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=10611#comment-164449</guid>
		<description>Hope this clears it up for everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope this clears it up for everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baylinorcrush</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/comment-page-2/#comment-164448</link>
		<dc:creator>baylinorcrush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=10611#comment-164448</guid>
		<description>This report from the Washington post confirms it:

ROSEMONT, Ill. — NFL owners emerged Tuesday after a day-long review of the broad concepts of a possible labor agreement with locked-out players ready to intensify talks with the goal of reaching an accord by early July.

Despite reported concerns of team owners, opposition to the plan hammered out in closed-door deliberations the past few weeks apparently was modest and confined to certain aspects of the complex deal.

Negotiations between team owners and locked-out players are scheduled to resume today in the Boston area. The sides likely will make a push to complete an agreement around July 4, said people familiar with the talks, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of deliberations.

&quot;I think the ownership has a better understanding of the framework and I think we have a better understanding of the various issues and priorities within the membership,&quot; NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said.

Any agreement would have to be approved by at least 24 of the 32 team owners. A deal probably would be accompanied by the players reconstituting their union, and would require approval by the federal court in which the players filed their antitrust lawsuit against the owners.

Goodell and DeMaurice Smith, executive director of the dissolved NFL Players Association, have participated in a series of negotiating sessions over the past three weeks, along with small groups of team owners and players. (That&#039;s where the guidelines of this proposal had to come from)

It appeared Tuesday that only a handful of owners had serious objections to the broad terms of the deal, according to people familiar with the owners&#039; deliberations. Some owners apparently want the agreement to provide protection for the teams in case of an economic downturn. Some also appear to believe the league should take advantage of recent courtroom victories to negotiate a more favorable pact.

But other owners are pressing for a deal on the terms currently under negotiation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This report from the Washington post confirms it:</p>
<p>ROSEMONT, Ill. — NFL owners emerged Tuesday after a day-long review of the broad concepts of a possible labor agreement with locked-out players ready to intensify talks with the goal of reaching an accord by early July.</p>
<p>Despite reported concerns of team owners, opposition to the plan hammered out in closed-door deliberations the past few weeks apparently was modest and confined to certain aspects of the complex deal.</p>
<p>Negotiations between team owners and locked-out players are scheduled to resume today in the Boston area. The sides likely will make a push to complete an agreement around July 4, said people familiar with the talks, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of deliberations.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think the ownership has a better understanding of the framework and I think we have a better understanding of the various issues and priorities within the membership,&#8221; NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said.</p>
<p>Any agreement would have to be approved by at least 24 of the 32 team owners. A deal probably would be accompanied by the players reconstituting their union, and would require approval by the federal court in which the players filed their antitrust lawsuit against the owners.</p>
<p>Goodell and DeMaurice Smith, executive director of the dissolved NFL Players Association, have participated in a series of negotiating sessions over the past three weeks, along with small groups of team owners and players. (That&#8217;s where the guidelines of this proposal had to come from)</p>
<p>It appeared Tuesday that only a handful of owners had serious objections to the broad terms of the deal, according to people familiar with the owners&#8217; deliberations. Some owners apparently want the agreement to provide protection for the teams in case of an economic downturn. Some also appear to believe the league should take advantage of recent courtroom victories to negotiate a more favorable pact.</p>
<p>But other owners are pressing for a deal on the terms currently under negotiation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baylinorcrush</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/comment-page-2/#comment-164447</link>
		<dc:creator>baylinorcrush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=10611#comment-164447</guid>
		<description>weatherman, you gotta read the relevant posts a little closer and you&#039;ll have your answers, in my 6:36 pm post I said &quot;Details of a proposed collective bargaining agreement being pitched TO NFL owners earlier today at the owners meeting&quot;, followed at 6:47 pm by &quot;Of course all this is a proposal FOR the owners probably from the results of the talks between Goddell and Smith and is far from being agreed upon by all (owners)&quot;. 

At least that is my understanding of it.

You just completely misread me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>weatherman, you gotta read the relevant posts a little closer and you&#8217;ll have your answers, in my 6:36 pm post I said &#8220;Details of a proposed collective bargaining agreement being pitched TO NFL owners earlier today at the owners meeting&#8221;, followed at 6:47 pm by &#8220;Of course all this is a proposal FOR the owners probably from the results of the talks between Goddell and Smith and is far from being agreed upon by all (owners)&#8221;. </p>
<p>At least that is my understanding of it.</p>
<p>You just completely misread me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seweatherman1</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/comment-page-2/#comment-164446</link>
		<dc:creator>seweatherman1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=10611#comment-164446</guid>
		<description>O.K. now I am really confused (which isn&#039;t hard these days). I was under the impression that this that bay has above is what Goodell is going to take and meet with Smith on Thursday in Chicago (I think) and present to him as what the owners are presenting. Apparantely this is not the case. The media on t.v. showed Goodell talking to the owners today and presenting this to the group that was, and has been, in the meetings with him the past several days. So this is a proposal from teh players? Correct? This looks super to me, especially the part of not having to go through this for another 10 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K. now I am really confused (which isn&#8217;t hard these days). I was under the impression that this that bay has above is what Goodell is going to take and meet with Smith on Thursday in Chicago (I think) and present to him as what the owners are presenting. Apparantely this is not the case. The media on t.v. showed Goodell talking to the owners today and presenting this to the group that was, and has been, in the meetings with him the past several days. So this is a proposal from teh players? Correct? This looks super to me, especially the part of not having to go through this for another 10 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikeyb1203</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/comment-page-2/#comment-164445</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikeyb1203</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=10611#comment-164445</guid>
		<description>Hopefully the Owners figure out what to keep in the offer and what to get rid of and give it to the players and they accept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully the Owners figure out what to keep in the offer and what to get rid of and give it to the players and they accept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seweatherman1</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/haggan-to-the-line/comment-page-2/#comment-164444</link>
		<dc:creator>seweatherman1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=10611#comment-164444</guid>
		<description>We all wish we had a piece of it! So, Goodell is meeting with Smith I think Thursday the news said. What is the next step to this mess?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all wish we had a piece of it! So, Goodell is meeting with Smith I think Thursday the news said. What is the next step to this mess?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
