<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broncos Blog Scoring Contest: Week 6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CARAMELLOO</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-462056</link>
		<dc:creator>CARAMELLOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=20112#comment-462056</guid>
		<description>I trust our O bc of Manning but my thoughts have always been if you win the toss kick off. Then you get the ball to start the second half with the chance to add more points if you have the lead, or add points if you&#039;re down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I trust our O bc of Manning but my thoughts have always been if you win the toss kick off. Then you get the ball to start the second half with the chance to add more points if you have the lead, or add points if you&#8217;re down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH709</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-462052</link>
		<dc:creator>RH709</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=20112#comment-462052</guid>
		<description>I prefer to defer as well. However, I think the big thought process is that if you can get the ball and score the first points you put the other team in the position to play catchup. Like this...if you trust your offense let them get the ball first, if you trust your defense then let them get the first crack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer to defer as well. However, I think the big thought process is that if you can get the ball and score the first points you put the other team in the position to play catchup. Like this&#8230;if you trust your offense let them get the ball first, if you trust your defense then let them get the first crack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CARAMELLOO</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-462050</link>
		<dc:creator>CARAMELLOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=20112#comment-462050</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m nowhere near sold on our D so my prediction is....

Broncos: 31
Chargers: 37

Another slow start by the offense, with a fight to get back in it, and our D not stopping the Chargers on what else... a critical 3rd down.

Can anyone please explain to me why we never defer to the 2nd half when we win the toss?? That always irks my nerves!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m nowhere near sold on our D so my prediction is&#8230;.</p>
<p>Broncos: 31<br />
Chargers: 37</p>
<p>Another slow start by the offense, with a fight to get back in it, and our D not stopping the Chargers on what else&#8230; a critical 3rd down.</p>
<p>Can anyone please explain to me why we never defer to the 2nd half when we win the toss?? That always irks my nerves!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH709</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-462047</link>
		<dc:creator>RH709</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=20112#comment-462047</guid>
		<description>Lets say, as an offense, you set up a 4 deep cover two beater. The offense is set up in 11 personnel, 2x2, TE to the offensive right. Defense lines up with 2 high safeties and CBs 4 yards off LOS. From the QB perspective it looks like the 4 deep routes is the right call. Qb is salivating cause he knows the is going to stress the safeties to the outside speed recievers and one of the guys running up the hash marks will end up open.

Say the corners stay put and try to jam the recievers off the line. The 5 guys rush the QB. The WRs shake the CBs in under 1.5 seconds. The RB picks up the 5th rusher pretty good. at 2 to 2.5 seconds the QB finishes his 7 step drop. The CBs are out of postion trailing the WRs. This further stresses the safeties cause now 2 safeties have to cover 4 recievers. The slightly slower TE is trailing just a little and the safeties head outside to cover the top side of the speedy WRs. Pass deep up the hashmarks complete to the TE for 40 to 60 yards.

Thing is, the play call dictates jamming a reiever or not. In this case the defensive call was really cover 6 in a cover 2 shell but by playing close to the line and jamming the reciever the CB to the open side of the field was way way out of his designated position which was the deep 1/3 of the field to the open side.

Not hatin on ya SEC, just trying to give you an example about how play call and scheme dictate what the CB does. I fully agree that against NE and the quick slants, more jamming should have taken place. Maybe not from the CB&#039;s but from the nickle corner (Harris, looking at you against Welker).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets say, as an offense, you set up a 4 deep cover two beater. The offense is set up in 11 personnel, 2&#215;2, TE to the offensive right. Defense lines up with 2 high safeties and CBs 4 yards off LOS. From the QB perspective it looks like the 4 deep routes is the right call. Qb is salivating cause he knows the is going to stress the safeties to the outside speed recievers and one of the guys running up the hash marks will end up open.</p>
<p>Say the corners stay put and try to jam the recievers off the line. The 5 guys rush the QB. The WRs shake the CBs in under 1.5 seconds. The RB picks up the 5th rusher pretty good. at 2 to 2.5 seconds the QB finishes his 7 step drop. The CBs are out of postion trailing the WRs. This further stresses the safeties cause now 2 safeties have to cover 4 recievers. The slightly slower TE is trailing just a little and the safeties head outside to cover the top side of the speedy WRs. Pass deep up the hashmarks complete to the TE for 40 to 60 yards.</p>
<p>Thing is, the play call dictates jamming a reiever or not. In this case the defensive call was really cover 6 in a cover 2 shell but by playing close to the line and jamming the reciever the CB to the open side of the field was way way out of his designated position which was the deep 1/3 of the field to the open side.</p>
<p>Not hatin on ya SEC, just trying to give you an example about how play call and scheme dictate what the CB does. I fully agree that against NE and the quick slants, more jamming should have taken place. Maybe not from the CB&#8217;s but from the nickle corner (Harris, looking at you against Welker).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SECBroncofan</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-462046</link>
		<dc:creator>SECBroncofan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=20112#comment-462046</guid>
		<description>RH709,I think jamming the WRs is necessary every week,it makes the QB have to hold the football longer,which equals more sacks and ints for the Defense,jmho!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RH709,I think jamming the WRs is necessary every week,it makes the QB have to hold the football longer,which equals more sacks and ints for the Defense,jmho!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH709</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-462045</link>
		<dc:creator>RH709</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=20112#comment-462045</guid>
		<description>Manning* (guess panning is what happens when I don&#039;t commit to saying Peyton or saying Manning)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manning* (guess panning is what happens when I don&#8217;t commit to saying Peyton or saying Manning)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH709</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-462044</link>
		<dc:creator>RH709</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=20112#comment-462044</guid>
		<description>On average, an NFL sack occurs at 2.7 seconds. Panning hardly ever holds the ball that long even on intermediate of 5 step routes. I don&#039;t fear the SD pass rush and I don&#039;t think Manning does either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On average, an NFL sack occurs at 2.7 seconds. Panning hardly ever holds the ball that long even on intermediate of 5 step routes. I don&#8217;t fear the SD pass rush and I don&#8217;t think Manning does either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH709</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-462043</link>
		<dc:creator>RH709</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=20112#comment-462043</guid>
		<description>SEC, I think more jamming would have been good last week but I don&#039;t see the need this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEC, I think more jamming would have been good last week but I don&#8217;t see the need this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH709</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-462042</link>
		<dc:creator>RH709</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=20112#comment-462042</guid>
		<description>I love Royal but he has always struggled to find the hole in a zone coverage. Meachem is talented but not VJ talented. 

Manning has been working hard to develope the timing routes as discussed previously about Brady. What is great about a three step turn and fire type of timing route is it almost completely nigates a pass rush. This is also why Manning and Brady don&#039;t take a lot of sacks. Getting the ball out in 1.5 to 2 seconds makes even the worst of O Linemen look good.

BTW our Oline has improved a lot since last year, especially Franklin and Beatles (i would say Walton too but he is now hurt, he had improved too though)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Royal but he has always struggled to find the hole in a zone coverage. Meachem is talented but not VJ talented. </p>
<p>Manning has been working hard to develope the timing routes as discussed previously about Brady. What is great about a three step turn and fire type of timing route is it almost completely nigates a pass rush. This is also why Manning and Brady don&#8217;t take a lot of sacks. Getting the ball out in 1.5 to 2 seconds makes even the worst of O Linemen look good.</p>
<p>BTW our Oline has improved a lot since last year, especially Franklin and Beatles (i would say Walton too but he is now hurt, he had improved too though)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SECBroncofan</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/denverbroncos/broncos-blog-scoring-contest-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-462040</link>
		<dc:creator>SECBroncofan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/?p=20112#comment-462040</guid>
		<description>One other thing,we need to start jamming the WRs at the LOS,quit letting them get off free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing,we need to start jamming the WRs at the LOS,quit letting them get off free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
