<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Programming Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4277</link>
		<dc:creator>Programming Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 05:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-4277</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Programming Tutorials&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn&#039;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Programming Tutorials</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sports Illustrated</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4278</link>
		<dc:creator>Sports Illustrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 07:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-4278</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sports Illustrated&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn&#039;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sports Illustrated</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: essiemcmorris</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4295</link>
		<dc:creator>essiemcmorris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 06:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-4295</guid>
		<description>Denver, how can you be so blind?? Can&#039;t you see what an asset Cliff Washburn can be for Denver ? My prayers and best wishes are for him and his NFL potential. Wake up, Denver, I thought your vision was better than this.  Just watch what happens in Cliff Washburn&#039;s position ! You&#039;re gonna be sorry as
BUSH when this season is over... just wait and see !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denver, how can you be so blind?? Can&#8217;t you see what an asset Cliff Washburn can be for Denver ? My prayers and best wishes are for him and his NFL potential. Wake up, Denver, I thought your vision was better than this.  Just watch what happens in Cliff Washburn&#8217;s position ! You&#8217;re gonna be sorry as<br />
BUSH when this season is over&#8230; just wait and see !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBaileyBurnYa</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4294</link>
		<dc:creator>CBaileyBurnYa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-4294</guid>
		<description>Wonder when Madden 08 will update the roster?   I use Kyle allot for crucial short runs and pass plays with online competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder when Madden 08 will update the roster?   I use Kyle allot for crucial short runs and pass plays with online competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woodbridgeNJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4293</link>
		<dc:creator>woodbridgeNJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-4293</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a Bronco fan for 23 yrs and i&#039;ve known Kyle Johnson personally since i was 9. I must say for me this is one of saddest days i&#039;ve seen in bronco country. He is class act individual and has given 110% since he arrived in Dove Valley. The team, the fans,and the city of denver are lossing not just a great player but a great person.Best of luck Kyle, I know we&#039;ll all see you again in another uniform.
all the best,
mike slicner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a Bronco fan for 23 yrs and i&#8217;ve known Kyle Johnson personally since i was 9. I must say for me this is one of saddest days i&#8217;ve seen in bronco country. He is class act individual and has given 110% since he arrived in Dove Valley. The team, the fans,and the city of denver are lossing not just a great player but a great person.Best of luck Kyle, I know we&#8217;ll all see you again in another uniform.<br />
all the best,<br />
mike slicner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sicknessfl</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4292</link>
		<dc:creator>sicknessfl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-4292</guid>
		<description>They ran alot of 2 TE / 1 RB sets, so having 4 TE&#039;s makes sense.  Leach is a special teams guy and that&#039;s it. (Not to take ANYTHING away from special teams value)  God help us if it gets so bad that he&#039;s playing legitimate minutes on offense though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They ran alot of 2 TE / 1 RB sets, so having 4 TE&#8217;s makes sense.  Leach is a special teams guy and that&#8217;s it. (Not to take ANYTHING away from special teams value)  God help us if it gets so bad that he&#8217;s playing legitimate minutes on offense though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBaileyBurnYa</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>CBaileyBurnYa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 23:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-4290</guid>
		<description>The only reason I can think of 5 TE&#039;s is because they plan to use allot of run blocking plays.  They may anticipate allot of injuries at that position with those plays or want to send fresh guys in late in the game to overpower a defense on the ground. I think we are going to see true smashmouth football in Denver this year.
  Hopefully Rice is going to end up in Denver. It would definitly help tip the scales. I am very concerned about the Bates defensive transition.  I have a feeling it will pay off in the end but wonder how long the growing pains will last. We could really use Al Wilson and he will be missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason I can think of 5 TE&#8217;s is because they plan to use allot of run blocking plays.  They may anticipate allot of injuries at that position with those plays or want to send fresh guys in late in the game to overpower a defense on the ground. I think we are going to see true smashmouth football in Denver this year.<br />
  Hopefully Rice is going to end up in Denver. It would definitly help tip the scales. I am very concerned about the Bates defensive transition.  I have a feeling it will pay off in the end but wonder how long the growing pains will last. We could really use Al Wilson and he will be missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewMason</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewMason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 23:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s start it off with all the comments about Leach.  I think &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-37789&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anonymous said it best&lt;/A&gt; by linking to Peter King&#039;s story about Leach.

Know this about No. 83 -- he hasn&#039;t had one bad snap since he&#039;s been in Denver.  Not one.  Even if he has one or two in the future, that still puts him ahead of just about everyone else at the position.  Given his snapping accuracy -- and his ability to consistently get downfield and make tackles, which defies his relatively pedestrian 40 time -- I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a better long snapper in the game than Leach.  Some who are as good, yes, but no one better.  And on the practice field, he can fill in at fullback and tight end.  Leach is most definitely a valuable player here.

&lt;strong&gt;vegasbronco:&lt;/strong&gt;

Personally, I like Cargile.  Hard-working, excellent on special teams, and willing to learn a multitude of different positions.  He played at weakside linebacker during organized team activities this year; that made him more valuable on the practice field, which could be a big part of the reason why he was added Sunday to Denver&#039;s practice squad.

&lt;STRONG&gt;USFBULL:&lt;/STRONG&gt;

Hadn&#039;t heard anything about Hall moving up to No. 2 ... We&#039;ll see what the first regular-season depth chart reveals this week. I wouldn&#039;t be totally shocked if he was the No. 2, though, because Travis Henry is still just two weeks removed from a sprained knee, and Hall was outstanding in goal-line and short-yardage situations in the full-contact practices at camp and against Arizona on Thursday.  Sometimes depth-chart placement is a matter of bringing some specific and highly-valued skill to the table -- that just might be the case with Hall at the goal line.

&lt;B&gt;57Yellow T-Bird and rev79:&lt;/B&gt;

Here are the rules on practice-squad eligibility, which comes from &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.nflpa.org/cba/cba_pdf/Article_XXXIV_Practice_Squads.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nflpa.org&lt;/A&gt;.  It&#039;s a little dense with legalese, of course:

&lt;I&gt;Section 4. Eligibility:
(a) The practice squad shall consist of the following players, provided that they have not served more than two previous seasons on a Practice Squad: (i) players who do not have an Accrued Season of NFL experience; and (ii) free agent players who were on the Active List for fewer than nine regular season games during their only Accrued Season(s). An otherwise eligible player may be a practice squad player for a third season only if the Club by which he is employed that season has at least 53 players on its Active/Inactive List during the entire period of his employment.
(b) A player shall be deemed to have served on a Practice Squad in a season if he has passed the club&#039;s physical and been a member of the club&#039;s Practice Squad for at least three regular season or postseason games during his first two Practice Squad seasons, and for at least one regular season or postseason game during his third Practice Squad season. (A bye week counts as a game provided that the player is not terminated until after the regular season or postseason weekend in question.)
Section 5. Active List: If a player on the Practice Squad of one club (Club A) signs an NFL Player Contract with another club (Club B), (1) the player shall receive three weeks salary of his NFL Player Contract at the 53-player Active/Inactive List minimum even if he is terminated by Club B prior to earning that amount, and (2) Club B is required to count the player on its 53-player Active/Inactive List for three games (a bye week counts as a game) even if he is terminated or assigned via waivers to another club or is signed as a free agent to another club&#039;s 53-player roster or another club&#039;s Practice Squad prior to that time. If the player is terminated from Club B&#039;s 53-player roster and signed to Club B&#039;s Practice Squad, he shall continue to count on the club&#039;s 53-player Active/Inactive List but shall not count against the eight-player Practice Squad limit until the three-game requirement has been fulfilled. If a player is terminated prior to the completion of the three-game period and is signed to Club B&#039;s Practice Squad or is signed or assigned to another club&#039;s 53-player roster or Practice Squad, any salary (as that term is defined in Article XXIV, Section 1(c)) that he receives from any NFL club applicable to the three-game period shall be an offset against the three weeks salary that he is entitled to receive from Club B.&lt;/I&gt;

Two major changes took place in regards to practice-squad eligibility in recent years:

1. The expansion from five players to eight.

2. The decision to allow players to be eligible for a third practice-squad season assuming squads kept 53 players on its primary roster for the entire length of their practice-squad stay.  It is under this proviso that Steve Cargile possesses practice-squad eligibility.

&lt;strong&gt;myleshigh:&lt;/strong&gt;

The Web site takes some getting used to, as with all new things.  I think some bugs are being worked out on the technical side of things ... but the folks in charge of such things are hard at work on those matters.  I&#039;ll admit to being a technical idiot when it comes to Web stuff, even though I write in HTML code.  Some of this Flash stuff ... it looks cool and dazzling, and, damn, I don&#039;t know how the heck they do it.

If I missed any comments, I apologize; I&#039;ve got company coming and steaks to grill.  Last free Sunday night until the end of the year (because I&#039;ll be on airplanes all day during the bye), so I&#039;ve got to do this thing right.  Talk to you Monday, if not sooner ... until then, &lt;i&gt;vaya con Dios&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s start it off with all the comments about Leach.  I think <a HREF="http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-37789" rel="nofollow">Anonymous said it best</a> by linking to Peter King&#8217;s story about Leach.</p>
<p>Know this about No. 83 &#8212; he hasn&#8217;t had one bad snap since he&#8217;s been in Denver.  Not one.  Even if he has one or two in the future, that still puts him ahead of just about everyone else at the position.  Given his snapping accuracy &#8212; and his ability to consistently get downfield and make tackles, which defies his relatively pedestrian 40 time &#8212; I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a better long snapper in the game than Leach.  Some who are as good, yes, but no one better.  And on the practice field, he can fill in at fullback and tight end.  Leach is most definitely a valuable player here.</p>
<p><strong>vegasbronco:</strong></p>
<p>Personally, I like Cargile.  Hard-working, excellent on special teams, and willing to learn a multitude of different positions.  He played at weakside linebacker during organized team activities this year; that made him more valuable on the practice field, which could be a big part of the reason why he was added Sunday to Denver&#8217;s practice squad.</p>
<p><strong>USFBULL:</strong></p>
<p>Hadn&#8217;t heard anything about Hall moving up to No. 2 &#8230; We&#8217;ll see what the first regular-season depth chart reveals this week. I wouldn&#8217;t be totally shocked if he was the No. 2, though, because Travis Henry is still just two weeks removed from a sprained knee, and Hall was outstanding in goal-line and short-yardage situations in the full-contact practices at camp and against Arizona on Thursday.  Sometimes depth-chart placement is a matter of bringing some specific and highly-valued skill to the table &#8212; that just might be the case with Hall at the goal line.</p>
<p><b>57Yellow T-Bird and rev79:</b></p>
<p>Here are the rules on practice-squad eligibility, which comes from <a HREF="http://www.nflpa.org/cba/cba_pdf/Article_XXXIV_Practice_Squads.pdf" rel="nofollow">nflpa.org</a>.  It&#8217;s a little dense with legalese, of course:</p>
<p><i>Section 4. Eligibility:<br />
(a) The practice squad shall consist of the following players, provided that they have not served more than two previous seasons on a Practice Squad: (i) players who do not have an Accrued Season of NFL experience; and (ii) free agent players who were on the Active List for fewer than nine regular season games during their only Accrued Season(s). An otherwise eligible player may be a practice squad player for a third season only if the Club by which he is employed that season has at least 53 players on its Active/Inactive List during the entire period of his employment.<br />
(b) A player shall be deemed to have served on a Practice Squad in a season if he has passed the club&#8217;s physical and been a member of the club&#8217;s Practice Squad for at least three regular season or postseason games during his first two Practice Squad seasons, and for at least one regular season or postseason game during his third Practice Squad season. (A bye week counts as a game provided that the player is not terminated until after the regular season or postseason weekend in question.)<br />
Section 5. Active List: If a player on the Practice Squad of one club (Club A) signs an NFL Player Contract with another club (Club B), (1) the player shall receive three weeks salary of his NFL Player Contract at the 53-player Active/Inactive List minimum even if he is terminated by Club B prior to earning that amount, and (2) Club B is required to count the player on its 53-player Active/Inactive List for three games (a bye week counts as a game) even if he is terminated or assigned via waivers to another club or is signed as a free agent to another club&#8217;s 53-player roster or another club&#8217;s Practice Squad prior to that time. If the player is terminated from Club B&#8217;s 53-player roster and signed to Club B&#8217;s Practice Squad, he shall continue to count on the club&#8217;s 53-player Active/Inactive List but shall not count against the eight-player Practice Squad limit until the three-game requirement has been fulfilled. If a player is terminated prior to the completion of the three-game period and is signed to Club B&#8217;s Practice Squad or is signed or assigned to another club&#8217;s 53-player roster or Practice Squad, any salary (as that term is defined in Article XXIV, Section 1(c)) that he receives from any NFL club applicable to the three-game period shall be an offset against the three weeks salary that he is entitled to receive from Club B.</i></p>
<p>Two major changes took place in regards to practice-squad eligibility in recent years:</p>
<p>1. The expansion from five players to eight.</p>
<p>2. The decision to allow players to be eligible for a third practice-squad season assuming squads kept 53 players on its primary roster for the entire length of their practice-squad stay.  It is under this proviso that Steve Cargile possesses practice-squad eligibility.</p>
<p><strong>myleshigh:</strong></p>
<p>The Web site takes some getting used to, as with all new things.  I think some bugs are being worked out on the technical side of things &#8230; but the folks in charge of such things are hard at work on those matters.  I&#8217;ll admit to being a technical idiot when it comes to Web stuff, even though I write in HTML code.  Some of this Flash stuff &#8230; it looks cool and dazzling, and, damn, I don&#8217;t know how the heck they do it.</p>
<p>If I missed any comments, I apologize; I&#8217;ve got company coming and steaks to grill.  Last free Sunday night until the end of the year (because I&#8217;ll be on airplanes all day during the bye), so I&#8217;ve got to do this thing right.  Talk to you Monday, if not sooner &#8230; until then, <i>vaya con Dios</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr_broncos22</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4289</link>
		<dc:creator>dr_broncos22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 22:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-4289</guid>
		<description>Everyone should keep in mind the versaility that the team has at those positions in which we are disappointed. I admit, the KJ release surprised me too, but the team is known for having multiple players on the roster that can play at multiple areas. Paul Smith is a good blocking fullback (he started for the leader in yards from scrimmage last year in St. Louis), and Sapp can step in for versatility. Cargile was coming on strong, but who would he replace right now? Cox, Abdullah, or Shoate? Maybe Shoate wasn&#039;t the best example, but you get my point. Everyone has multiple roles at these positions in questions. Jimmy Kennedy was a pretty surprising cut, but I saw some of the last preseason game, and it looked like he was over comitting on penetration on early downs (the main thing Gerrard Warren got scapegoated for)! Bottem line...the guys that are still there, have to perform there roles (however many there are), and win football games!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone should keep in mind the versaility that the team has at those positions in which we are disappointed. I admit, the KJ release surprised me too, but the team is known for having multiple players on the roster that can play at multiple areas. Paul Smith is a good blocking fullback (he started for the leader in yards from scrimmage last year in St. Louis), and Sapp can step in for versatility. Cargile was coming on strong, but who would he replace right now? Cox, Abdullah, or Shoate? Maybe Shoate wasn&#8217;t the best example, but you get my point. Everyone has multiple roles at these positions in questions. Jimmy Kennedy was a pretty surprising cut, but I saw some of the last preseason game, and it looked like he was over comitting on penetration on early downs (the main thing Gerrard Warren got scapegoated for)! Bottem line&#8230;the guys that are still there, have to perform there roles (however many there are), and win football games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjjj</title>
		<link>http://blog.denverbroncos.com/archives/the-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-4288</link>
		<dc:creator>jjjj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.denverbroncos.com/mason/2007/09/01/the-cuts/#comment-4288</guid>
		<description>jjjjj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jjjjj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
